<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chuck Milam &#187; imold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chuck.milams.net/tag/imold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chuck.milams.net</link>
	<description>Cognitive Dissonance from a Wisconsinite in Kentucky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:54:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2010: Round Numbers Prevent “Decade Denial”</title>
		<link>http://chuck.milams.net/2010/01/20/2010-round-numbers-prevent-%e2%80%9cdecade-denial%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://chuck.milams.net/2010/01/20/2010-round-numbers-prevent-%e2%80%9cdecade-denial%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cultural Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life Logging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imold]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuck.milams.net/2010/01/20/2010-round-numbers-prevent-%e2%80%9cdecade-denial%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, so we are now twenty or so days into the year 2010, and I’ve come to realize something: This nice round-numbered year is making it really hard for me to engage in what I’ve come to call “decade denial.” Allow me to explain: In previous years, let’s say…2009, for example…it was much easier for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so we are now twenty or so days into the year 2010, and I’ve come<br />
to realize something:</p>
<p>This nice round-numbered year is making it really hard for me to<br />
engage in what I’ve come to call “decade denial.”  Allow me to<br />
explain:  In previous years, let’s say…2009, for example…it was much<br />
easier for me to imagine that “…2005 wasn’t that long ago.”  Here’s<br />
where it hit me:  I was just looking at an article dated 2005 and I<br />
was trying to determine if it was still fresh information…and a month<br />
ago, I might have used it.  However, with that big fat “10” at the end<br />
of the current year, the easy math gets me thinking, “Holy crap,<br />
that’s five years old already.”</p>
<p>I bet I’m not the only one seeing this.  Subtracting from 10 makes<br />
 for easy math, which means I can no longer deny that time is marching on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chuck.milams.net/2010/01/20/2010-round-numbers-prevent-%e2%80%9cdecade-denial%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

